The most common is the functional method of identifying little segmental parameters has been proposed as an effective way to reduce the proposed variability of anatomical definitions (Besier et al., 2003; Della Croce et al., 1999). However, the use of markerless technology to record 3-D kinematics is still a minority technique (Richards and Thewlis, 2008) and has been limited by the intricacy of obtaining precise 3-D kinematics using this approach (Corazza et al., 2006). Future research may wish to replicate the current investigation using markerless anatomical frame definition to further examine the efficacy of this technique. The fact that this paper focused solely on 3-D angulation and angular velocities is potentially a limitation of the current investigation.
Future investigations should focus on additional kinetic parameters such as joint moments which may be influenced by differences in anatomical frame definition (Thewlis et al., 2008). Joint moments have strong sporting and clinical significance and may also be influenced by variations in the anatomical frame thus it is important to also consider their reliability. Finally, care should be taken when attempting to generalize the findings of this study to investigations examining pathological kinematics. It is likely that variations will exist in the relative contributions of the sources of measurement error in participants who exhibit an abnormal gait pattern (Gorton et al., 2009). For participants with skeletal alignment pathologies, palpation and subsequent marker placement may be more complex and result in reduced reliability (Gorton et al.
, 2009). In conclusion, based on the results obtained from the methodologies used in the current investigation, it appears that the anatomical co-ordinate axes of the lower extremities can be defined reliably. Future research should focus on the efficacy and advancement of markerless techniques. Table 2 Knee joint kinematics (means, standard deviations) from the stance limb as a function of Test and Retest anatomical co-ordinate axes (* = Significant main effect p��0.05). Table 5 Knee joint velocities (means, standard deviations) from the stance limb as a function of Test and Retest anatomical co-ordinate axes (* = Significant main effect p��0.05) Acknowledgments Our thanks go to Glen Crook for his technical assistance.
Uniform instructions on the Code of Points (CoP) in gymnastics under the Federation International Anacetrapib of Gymnastics (FIG) date back to 1949. Every four years after the Olympic Games, the FIG Technical Committee improves and further develops the CoP. Biomechanics research in gymnastics is a growing area of interest, especially when related to scoring of vault difficulty. Physical parameters of vaults are generally-known (Brueggeman, 1994; Prassas, 1995; 2006; Krug, 1997; Takei, 1991; 1998; 2007; Takei et al., 2000; ?uk and Kar��csony, 2004; Naundorf et al.