1b While only a single AipA homolog was found in each of the exa

1b. While only a single AipA homolog was found in each of the examined Aspergillus species, two AipA homologs were present in each yeast species, with the exception of Candida

albicans. These homologs were thought to correspond to S. cerevisiae Sap1p and Yta6p. AipA showed 34% and 33% amino-acid sequence identity to Sap1p and Yta6p, respectively (Supporting Information, Fig. S1). Although both Sap1p and Yta6p are putative AAA ATPases (Fig. 1a), their functions have not been elucidated in detail. To confirm the interaction between AipA and AoAbp1, we performed a more detailed YTH analysis. First, it was demonstrated that these full-length proteins interact with each other (Fig. 2a). Next, to identify the interacting regions of AipA and AoAbp1, we performed further YTH analyses using truncated AipA and

AoAbp1 sequences. Because the construct containing two SH3 domains of AoAbp1 activated YTH reporters alone (data Y-27632 purchase not buy Ceritinib shown), it was not used in the YTH analysis. As a result of the comprehensive fragment analysis, it was revealed that amino-acid residues 346-370 of AipA interact with the two SH3 domains of AoAbp1 (Fig. 2a). Within this 25 amino-acid sequence of AipA, a total of eight proline residues were observed (Fig. 2b). Although this 25 amino-acid sequence with eight proline residues was not found by the motif analysis, this YTH result was considered reasonable as SH3 domains typically interact with proline-rich regions. Moreover, to test the interaction between AipA and AoAbp1 in vitro, we conducted a GST pull-down assay using the two SH3 domains of AoAbp1 fused with GST (GST-AoAbp1 SH3s) and lysate prepared from an A. oryzae strain expressing 6×Myc-AipA as bait and prey, respectively (Fig. 2c, d). This analysis indicated that AipA interacted with the two SH3 domains of AoAbp1 in vitro. AAA ATPases characteristically oligomerize into hexamers (White & Lauring, 2007). Thus, to analyze whether AipA exhibited self-interaction, we performed YTH analysis using AipA as

both bait and prey (Fig. S2a). The analysis demonstrated ever that full-length AipA was capable of self-interaction. Moreover, the self-interaction of full-length AipA was confirmed by a GST pull-down assay using GST-AipA as bait and 6×Myc-AipA as prey (Fig. S2b). These results suggest that AipA functions with a feature of AAA ATPase. To analyze the localization of AipA in vivo, we generated a strain that express egfp-aipA under control of the native promoter in the ΔaipA (see the section below) background. Approximately 1000 bp upstream region of aipA was utilized as the native promoter. However, no enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) fluorescence was observed in the strain likely because of the low amount of aipA expression (data not shown). Thus, we generated a strain that ectopically expresses egfp-aipA under control of the pgkA promoter in the WT background.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>