It is fairly obvious that the current CFP framework does little t

It is fairly obvious that the current CFP framework does little to fulfil these conditions. In addition to the problem of fragmented and uneven development of stakeholder organizations across Member States, the top-down style of micro-management is not ALK signaling pathway conducive to the development of industry partners ready to take on management responsibilities. Whereas the establishment of Regional Advisory Committees (RACs) and the involvement of national and/or transnational producer organizations (POs) in quota management are steps in the right direction, there seems to be a long way to go in developing strong industry partners

capable of taking on a comprehensive role as operators in a RBM system. Further, the responsibility for resource conservation, as set forth in the Treaties [67], leaves very little room for delegating management responsibility, be it to regional management bodies or industry partners. Further, there has been little movement in the direction of and cost recovery and of sharing or reversing the burden of evidence. Finally, while there are movements towards ITQ-like systems in some EU fisheries, strong arrangements for securing rights and privileges of resource users are absent in most cases.Resource

users, and their organizations may therefore lack sufficient motivation for investing in management and research through RBM like arrangements. As this suggests, the current CFP framework is not Ipilimumab cost conducive Montelukast Sodium to the development of RBM practices. To the extent that cases with RBM-like features can be found, these are at best partial, as in the cases of stakeholder initiation of management plans or in the implementation of recovery plans, or do not involve RBM in an organizational sense, as in the case of CQM. To which extent will the current CFP reform be able to change this state of affairs and construct a framework better suited for the RBM model? Given the thrust of the Green Paper, in particular its emphasis on RBM as

an approach that could repair the structural weaknesses of the CFP, this appears as a possibility. On the other hand, the CFP is strongly committed to ideas that are incongrous with RBM forms, and previous reform attempts have demonstrated that it does not change easily. Since it is not yet clear how the reformed CFP will be implemented in detail, definitive answers cannot be given to this question. The final compromise text on the Basic regulation on the CFP [68] and the Market Organization [69], however, include elements on RBM, although in a significantly changed form than the Commission envisaged in its Green Paper: The new CFP emphasizes the importance of developing multiannual management plans.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>