PCV-7 has been shown in many studies to be highly immunogenic and effective against IPD [5], [15], [16] and [17], with the vaccine efficacy of 97.4% against vaccine serotypes in the US [5]. In the large trial in South Africa and Gambia, the efficacy of PCV-9 was 83% and 77% against IPD caused by vaccine serotypes [18] and [19]. Twice as many IPD cases were indirectly prevented due to herd immunity after the PCV-7 implementation in the US [8]. Due to serotype specific efficacy of the vaccine, serotype coverage of IPD implies and predicts the efficacy of the vaccine. In this region, the serotype coverage of 70.3% by PCV-7 in IPD in children under five years of age in our study was less than the 78% coverage found in Singapore

[15], but higher than in a study in China in 2008 which found 63.6%, 64.8% and 79.6% coverage by PCV-7, PCV-10 and PCV-13, respectively [20].

The serotype coverage of IPD isolates by PCV-7 in children ≤14 years selleck compound old in Taiwan was 85%, somewhat higher than in our study [21]. WHO reported the overall serotype coverage of PCV-7 ranged from 60 to 85% worldwide [22]. There has been a concern about the increased proportion of nonvaccine serotypes reported in the US and Spain after introduction of PCV-7 vaccination program [8], [23] and [24]. The widely use of PCV-7 may contributed to the emergence of nonvaccine serotypes, especially serotype 19A [8], [23] and [24]. However, a study in Korea reported an increase in serotype 19A even before the introduction either of DAPT concentration PCV-7 [25]. It is probable that both selective vaccine pressure and clonal spread were contributing factors to the circulating serotypes in the community. In Thailand, we reported the serotype coverage of PCV-7, PCV-9, PCV-11, and PCV-13 of 73.9%, 77.4%, 77.4%, and 87.8%, respectively, in children younger than 5 years of age during 2001–2005 [11]. The serotype coverage found in this study was somewhat lower than that report, but was still within the 95% confidential interval. Although PCV-7 has been available in Thailand since June 2006, the vaccine has been

used mainly in private settings with an estimated 55,000 doses sold each year, representing less than 5% of children <5 years of age. This low vaccine uptake did not seem to affect the serotype distribution in this relatively small study. The top seven serotypes of invasive isolates found in our study were different in rank of order and frequency (%) in each age groups, as well as whether the sites were sterile or non-sterile. Although the top seven serotypes of isolates from sterile sites in children younger than 5 years of age were not completely match with other studies reported earlier in Thailand [11], [26], [27] and [28], they were quite consistent. The common serotypes found in those and our studies were 6B, 14, 19A, 19F, 23F. The PCV that included all these serotypes, i.e. PCV-13, would be the most appropriate for large scale use in Thailand.