(PPT 392 KB) Additional file 4: Table S1. A-C Evaluation of Major Phyla for Response to Dietary treatments. Associated statistical tables for Additional file 3: Figure S2A-C. A One-way Analysis of Firmicutes by Treatment, B One-way Analysis of Bacteroidetes by Treatment, C Matched pair comparisons testing FK228 in vitro the response of the ratio of abundances
observed between Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes. (DOC 45 KB) Additional file 5: Table S2. A-D Evaluation of Phyla showing a response (significant < 0.05, influenced < 0.1) to dietary treatments. Associated statistical tables for Additional file 1: Figure S1A-D. A Oneway Analysis of Synergistetes by Treatment, B Oneway Analysis of WS3 by Treatment, C Oneway Analysis of Actinobacteria by Treatment, D Oneway Analysis of Spirochaetes by Treatment. (DOC 42 KB) Additional file 6: Figure S4. Influence of DDG's diets on beef I-BET151 price cattle fecal microbiota at the level of
bacterial classes. (PPT 110 KB) Additional file 7: Figure S5. Influence of DDG’s diets on beef cattle fecal microbiota at the level of bacterial families. (PPT 200 KB) Additional file 8: Figure S6. (A) Distribution of bacterial classes amongst diets and animals as revealed by heatmap. (B) Distribution of bacterial class’s average across diets and animals. (PPT 121 KB) Additional file 9: Figure S7. Influence of DDG’s diets on beef cattle fecal microbiota at the level of bacterial families. (PPT 124 KB) Additional file 10: Figure S8. (A) Distribution of bacterial orders (> 99% abundance)
amongst diets and animals. (B) Distribution of bacterial orders (> 99% abundance) average across diets and animals. (PPT 234 KB) Additional file 11: Figure S9. (A) Distribution of the top (≥ 97% abundant) Cediranib (AZD2171) families observed amongst dietary treatments. (B) Distribution of the top (≥ 97% abundant) families averaged observed amongst dietary treatments. (PPT 242 KB) Additional file 12: Table S3. Average abundance of taxa by treatment. Taxa that showed a response to dietary treatment (see SEM and P-values). (DOC 86 KB) Additional file 13: Table S4. Average abundance of species by treatment. Species that showed a response to dietary treatment (see SEM and P-values). (DOC 108 KB) References 1. Richman S: Ethanol and distillers grains: situation and outlook. In International Distillers Grains Conference. Schaumburg, IL; 2007:29–39. 2. Miller DN, Selleckchem AZD3965 Woodbury BL: A solid-phase microextraction chamber method for analysis of manure volatiles. J Environ Qual 2006, 35:2383–2394.PubMedCrossRef 3. Varel VH: Livestock manure odor abatement with plant-derived oils and nitrogen conservation with urease inhibitors: a review. J Anim Sci 2002, 80:E1-E7. 4. Varel VH, Wells JE, Berry ED, Spiehs MJ, Miller DN, Ferrell CL, Shackelford SD, Koohmaraie M: Odorant production and persistence of Escherichia col in manure slurries from cattle fed zero, twenty, forty or sixty percent wet distillers grains with solubles. J Anim Sci 2008, 86:3617–3627.PubMedCrossRef 5.