In contrast, stress response of passive stress-copers is characterized by a large contribution of the HPA-axis and relatively little activation AZD6244 order of the sympathetic nervous system (Koolhaas et al., 2011). Previous studies reported that rats differing in stress-coping

style also differed in their susceptibility for anxiety- and depression-like behavioral phenotypes, as well as in their metabolic phenotypes. Typically, rats characterized by passive stress-coping styles display higher levels of anxiety- and depression-like behavior (Koolhaas et al., 1999). Additionally, passively coping rats derived from either selective breeding or wild rat colonies were prone to weight gain and hyperinsulinemia when fed a high fat diet compared to selleck kinase inhibitor proactive rats (Boersma et al., 2011, Boersma et al., 2010 and Boersma et al., 2009). In our recent studies, we found that PNS may modulate the stress-coping phenotype of the offspring. We showed that the distribution of the stress-coping behavior, expressed as the percentage time spent burying during the defensive burying test, was altered

within the PNS rat population (Boersma et al., 2014a). In contrast to the control population, where about 16% of the rats were characterized as intermediate, there were no rats showing an intermediate stress-coping phenotype within the PNS offspring population (Fig. 1A). Additionally, among those rats characterized as proactive coping, PNS rats spent more time burying that the control rats (Fig. 1B). Because the defensive burying behavior is set up to measure proactive stress-coping behavior, it is difficult to conclude whether tuclazepam PNS also altered passive stress coping behavior. It is possible that if a behavioral test targeted towards passive stress-coping behavior is used, a similar shift in phenotype will be observed. Overall, the data presented in Fig. 1 suggest that PNS may result in a more distinct expression of

an individual’s stress-coping phenotype. Consistent with the studies in rats selected for stress-coping style, we found that passive coping PNS offspring gained more body weight, were hyperleptinemic and had impaired glucose tolerance compared to proactive coping PNS offspring after being fed a high fat diet for three weeks in adulthood (Boersma et al., 2014a). No differentiation in the metabolic phenotype was observed between passive and proactive rats derived from unstressed control dams thus, in this case, the metabolic phenotype is not solely dependent on the stress-coping style (Boersma et al., 2014a). It seems that PNS modulates the stress-coping style, inducing a more extreme phenotype, and that this in turn results in the increased body weight and glucose impairment observed in the passive coping PNS offspring.