, 2008). Tectonic uplift in mountain headwaters increases relief, whereas subsidence in lowlands lowers a river’s baselevel PF-01367338 (Keller and Pinter, 1996 and Schumm, 1999). Both tectonic processes may produce steepened alluvial channels with increased sediment transport capacity and the potential to lower channel bed elevations, resulting in a series of adjustments (Bowman et al., 2009) and transformation of floodplains to terraces. Human-caused alterations overlaid onto natural fluvial systems once governed largely by tectonic and climate forces. Anthropogenic causes of incision in rivers has been linked to numerous landuse factors that alter basin hydrology,

sediment supply, baselevel, and sediment transport dynamics—with controls exerted from spatially diverse areas within the watershed (Richards, 1982) that contribute to a watershed’s disturbance regime may lead to channel incision in several ways: (1) changes in flow and sediment supply from the upstream headwaters that modify the ration of flow to sediment discharge as well as sediment transport capacity; (2) downstream baselevel changes that initiate headward migration of knickpoints; and (3) local channel alterations that increase slope, inhibit widening, or directly remove sediment

from the channel bed. Changes in watershed hydrology or sediment supply and size characteristics are dominant factors governing downstream alluvial channel morphology, with a change in the ratio of discharge to sediment load causing incision (Galay, 1983). Numerous geomorphic investigations have focused on river response Trametinib to minor climatic shifts that have occurred during the past two centuries, since European settlement in the United States (Bull, 1991, Knighton, 1998 and Ritter et

al., 2011) and Isoconazole it is well understood that differences in timing of geomorphic changes in response to such climate shifts may occur because of drainage basin size (scale), and the sequential lags that may occur with changes in vegetation, runoff, sediment supply and geomorphic response (e.g. Bull, 1991, Knighton, 1998 and Ritter et al., 2011). Moreover, asynchronous responses to disturbances among adjacent watersheds (Taylor and Lewin, 1997) and non-linearity in spatial distribution of responses to disturbances within a watershed (Coulthard et al., 2005) exemplify the difficulty in interpreting climate driven versus anthropogenic causes of incision. Blum and Törnqvist (2000) noted that that modern valley incision can be related to changes in climate, associated alterations in vegetation cover or erosion rates that in turn affect sediment yield of the drainage basin—independently of slope changes in the longitudinal profile. In such cases, erosion caused by climate change could initiate incision along great lengths of rivers distant from the coast.