(C) 2009 IBRO Published by Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved “

(C) 2009 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.”
“Purpose: We assessed the relationship between provider volume and outcomes following brachytherapy in a population based cohort of men.

Materials and Methods: We analyzed the claims of Medicare enrolled men older than 65 years living in Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results surveillance areas who were diagnosed with prostate cancer from 1991 to 1999 and underwent brachytherapy as initial treatment. Case volume was calculated for each physician and hospital from 1991 to 2001 from Medicare claims.

Outcomes of interest were recurrence, prostate cancer death, all deaths and 2-year complications. Analyses were adjusted click here by patient and treatment selleck kinase inhibitor characteristics.

Results: We identified 5,595 men for whom a radiation oncologist and a hospital provider could be identified. Men who were older, nonwhite, lower income, unmarried, living in nonurban areas or had more comorbidities were more likely to see lower volume physicians. Physician volume was not associated with the complication rate after brachytherapy. However, men treated at higher volume hospitals had a slightly lower rate of combined complication diagnoses and procedures (OR 0.94/100 cases, p < 10.01). Patients treated

by higher volume physicians had a lower recurrence rate (HR 0.89/100

cases, p = 0.01) and rate of prostate cancer death (HR 0.80/100 cases, p = 0.03) with a borderline significant decrease in all deaths (HR 0.95/100 cases, p = 0.05). There was no significant association between hospital volume and recurrence, prostate cancer death or all deaths.

Conclusions: Men treated with brachytherapy by higher volume physicians were at lower risk for recurrence and prostate cancer death, and showed a borderline decrease in total deaths. We did not observe a clear relationship between provider volume and complications following treatment.”
“Although it has been shown that an alternative dominant percept induced by an ambiguous visual scene has neural Pyruvate dehydrogenase correlates in various cortical areas, it is not known how such a dominant percept is maintained until it switches to another. We measured the primary visual response to the two-frame bistable apparent motion stimulus (stroboscopic alternative motion) when observers continuously perceived one motion and compared this with the response for another motion using magnetoencephalography. We observed a response component at around 160 ms after the frame change, the amplitude of which depended on the perceived motion. In contrast, brain responses to less ambiguous and physically unambiguous motions in both the horizontal and vertical directions did not evoke such a component.

Comments are closed.