Expressing snail or slug also suppressed E-cadherin but up-regulated

Etoposide mw fascin ( Figure 3D and Supplementary 6A). Knockdown of slug reduced fascin expression ( Supplementary Figure 6B), and stable expression of twist ( Figure 3C and D and Supplementary Figure 6A) or transient knockdown of zeb1, zeb2, or E-cadherin, did not change fascin levels ( Supplementary Figure 6C). Knockdown of fascin did not affect slug expression ( Supplementary Figure 6C). These observations were confirmed in 061843 PDAC cells ( Supplementary Figure 6D and E). Slug mediates fascin expression in PDAC cells. In addition, expression of slug or snail in human pancreatic cancer cells PANC-1 and human colon cancer cells HT29 induced fascin expression ( Supplementary Figure 6F), suggesting a general effect of slug and BAY 73-4506 chemical structure snail on fascin expression in both mouse and human cancer cells. We next investigated expression of fascin and slug during EMT changes

in KPC PDAC tumors. Interestingly, fascin and slug were both absent from ductal and acinar cells in normal pancreas and PanIN1/2 lesions (Figure 4A). Slug was expressed in fascin-positive (but not negative) PanIN3 lesions ( Figure 4A), indicating a correlation between early markers of EMT and fascin expression during PDAC progression. Fascin and slug were present in all PDACs, regardless of E-cadherin staining or differentiation status ( Figure 4B). In addition, fascin expression significantly correlated with slug expression in 3 independent cohorts of pancreatic cancer patients ( Supplementary Figure 7). We propose that slug-induced EMT is an important regulator of fascin expression in pancreatic cancer. Given the induction of fascin by slug and their tight association in human and mouse pancreatic cancer, we set out to determine whether fascin is a direct transcriptional target of slug. We screened the promoter and first intron region of mouse fascin for slug-binding E-box sequences (CACCTG or CAGGTG).26 We found a potential E-box sequence CACCTG located within the first intron of the

mouse fascin gene at +2470 to +2475 bp (Figure 5A). This consensus E-box sequence is highly conserved among mammalian fascins ( Figure 5A). We designed 3 sets of primers around the putative E-box sequence: primer ID-8 set 1 targets the identified E-box, while primer sets 2 and 3 target adjacent regions ( Figure 5A). Slug co-precipitated with the putative fascin E-box element ( Figure 5B). Cotransfection of the +2345 to +2600 region of the fascin first intron in a luciferase reporter plasmid with a plasmid expressing slug into 070669 PDAC cells drove a significant increase in luciferase activity ( Figure 5C). Mutagenesis of the E-box sequence eliminated the ability of slug to induce luciferase activity ( Figure 5C). We propose that fascin is a direct transcriptional target of slug. We next explored the hypothesis that fascin was a driver of invasion and metastasis in PDAC.