Temperate and tropical invertebrates, such as the peach-potato aphid, Myzus persicae, the predatory mirid, Nesidiocoris tenuis, and the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens, lose the ability to coordinate movement (CTmin) at temperatures above 0 °C, and more usually above +3 °C Z-VAD-FMK datasheet ( Chidwanyika and Terblanche, 2011, Clusella-Trullas et al., 2010, Hazell et al., 2010, Hughes et al., 2010 and Nyamukondiwa and Terblanche, 2010; Piyaphongkul personal communication). These CTmin

values are not compatible with polar summer microhabitat temperatures, which regularly fall below 0 °C and average less than +3 °C in the maritime and continental Antarctic, and only a little more in the High Arctic ( Davey et al., 1992, Block et al., 2009, Coulson et al., 1993 and Strathdee and Bale, 1998). It is not surprising, therefore, that polar terrestrial

invertebrates have lower thermal thresholds than their temperate and tropical counterparts, and have been observed performing activity at temperatures as low as −13.3 °C ( Sinclair et al., 2006), including attempts to fly at −4 °C ( Hågvar, 2010). Other examples of sub-zero activity are found in high altitude environments and include Himalayan Diamesa sp., which has been observed walking at −16 °C ( MacMillan and Sinclair, 2010). In the current study, the CTmin and chill coma of the two Collembola, M. arctica and C. antarcticus, and the mite, A. antarcticus, were below −0.6 and −3.8 °C, respectively. Locomotion analysis also showed that the invertebrates walked in a coordinated manner at +4 and 0 °C, and that they were capable of movement at −4 °C, but at a reduced Everolimus clinical trial speed (Figs. 3-5). In the two collembolan species, the CTmin of individuals maintained at +4 °C was low, averaging between −3.5 and −4 °C. Conversely, the CTmin of the mite only averaged −0.6 °C, even though its chill coma was similar to both Collembola

(Fig. 1). many Observation revealed that the mites tended to aggregate or stop moving early in the cooling regime and moved little thereafter. Alaskozetes antarcticus is well known to aggregate in the field, and has been observed aggregating in numbers of tens, hundreds and even many thousands of individuals ( Richard et al., 1994, Strong, 1967 and Tilbrook, 1973). Block and Convey (1995) and other authors suggest that, due to the reduced surface area to volume ratio of the aggregation, this behaviour may buffer the mite against low temperatures and reduce water loss. The reason that mites may aggregate so early on during the cooling regime at temperatures near to 0 °C, rather than attempting to select for more “optimal” thermal conditions, may be a consequence of their relatively restricted mobility. Unlike Collembola, which are more capable of moving rapidly to habitats in their preferred temperature range (Figs. 3-5), restricted mobility leaves non-acclimated mites susceptible to a sudden cold exposure. Hence, it may be better for mites to select sub-lethal low temperatures and acclimate.