The high socio-economic status of the sample limits the generaliz

The high socio-economic status of the sample limits the generalizability of

findings to other Indonesian women experiencing infertility who do not access biomedical care due to their relatively poor socio-economic status or remote location. This convenience sample therefore provides insight relevant only to the experiences and needs of a specific sub-population of infertility patients who are in a position to access and pay for biomedical infertility care available only in large cities. The sample size for analysis was 212 and descriptive and categorical analysis was performed by two statisticians using STATA. Below we present our findings on a number of themes which are: sources of information about infertility, knowledge of reproduction Selleck PR-171 and infertility, knowledge of the causes and treatment of infertility, written information provided to patients and requested information. These five thematic clusters of survey questions were devised to generate information about current sources and levels of information among patients, to identify knowledge deficits, and to provide insight for developing a more comprehensive approach to patient education for Indonesian infertility patients. Participants were provided with plain language

information sheets and asked to provide voluntary informed consent. They were informed of their right to skip questions and to withdraw from participation before their de-identified data was stored. All interviews Roxadustat were conducted in private counseling rooms and took between 30 and 45 min. Ethics approval was granted by the La Trobe University Human Ethics Adenosine Committee, the relevant ethics committees of the University of Indonesia and Airlangga University, as well as by the three hospitals

involved as recruitment sites. Because we understood that patients were likely to have knowledge deficits improving their knowledge was considered an ethical obligation. Thus, following each interview, survey participants were given an information booklet in lay language which contained the correct answers to knowledge questions in the survey, and an overview of the prevalence, causes and treatment of infertility. Respondents were asked to list all sources of infertility information they had accessed prior to their most recent obstetrician/gynecologist (OBSGYN) visit. Patients provided multiple responses that yielded 13 categories of information sources. Table 2 below depicts the percentage of infertility patients who accessed the eight most popular sources of information, and patterns of access to those sources according to participant characteristics. The four most popular sources of information were OBSGYN—77%; friends—44%; the internet—31%; and family members—23%.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>