Paradoxically, one might predict that a decrement in the fidelity of the coupling between these

systems would actually lead to better sensitivity to image statistics at more peripheral locations, a notion that has often been applied to autistic individuals (see below). Regardless, given that individuals with autism exhibit more variable and inaccurate eye movements (Goldberg et al., 2002; Takarae et al., 2004; PD0332991 Stanley-Cary et al., 2011), a possible explanation for these inaccuracies to clearly visible target stimuli could well relate to decrements in the temporal coupling of covert attention and overt movements. If so, early cortical representations as established within the lateral connections could be less influenced by these processes in ASD. It is noteworthy that the thesis that altered visual perception in ASD might be a function of atypical neural connectivity in early visual cortices has been previously invoked (Bertone et al.,

2005). Based on psychophysical results pointing to reduced discriminability for second-order contrast gratings despite increased discriminability for simple first-order gratings, these authors this website concluded that lateral inhibition must be enhanced in ASD. Neuroanatomical studies also support the notion that cortical representations are altered in autism. There are reports of microstructural differences in several parts of neocortex. In post-mortem studies, it has been noted that brains of individuals with ASD exhibit a neuronal microstructure consistent with smaller cortical minicolumns in sensory and higher-order cortices (Casanova et al., 2010). Minicolumns can be conceptualized as an interconnected, vertical group

of 80–100 neurons that exhibit similar response characteristics (Mountcastle, 1997). In V1, many of these minicolumns are thought to consist of cells that are responsive to a given spatial orientation, while neighboring minicolumns will prefer another orientation. Minicolumns have been reported to contain fewer cells in ASD, but at the same time, the number of neurons is comparable due to a concomitant increase in the overall number of minicolumns in brains of autistic individuals (Casanova et al., 2002). Vasopressin Receptor Even though these studies examined the number of neurons in cortex and not the number of connections, it is very likely that the observed differences in neuronal arrangement are related to, or even caused by, changes in lateral connections. However, as every minicolumn is thought to represent a receptive field (Buxhoeveden & Casanova, 2002), it is conceivable that there is an increase in the number of receptive fields in different cortical areas in ASD. Therefore, the observed increase in response to peripheral visual stimulation could also be explained by an increased number of receptive units per area of peripheral visual space.