This was also true for predictions of inanimate toy movements (wind-up toys, Cross et al. 2011a). At first glance, the employment of prediction processes during (rather “unpredictable”) nonbiological, arbitrary perceptual events might appear maladaptive, as they are bound to lead to guesswork. Yet, only through such initial guesswork can a feedback process be launched (Van der Stigchel et al. 2009) that has the potential to eventually lead to the acquisition of new (predictive) sensorimotor experience (cf. Cross et al. 2006). Thus, we suggest that the human brain’s tendency to employ prediction processes, even during the observation of unfamiliar,
Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical arbitrary, or nongoal-directed movements (cf. Cross et al. 2006, 2011a,b), is of
vital adaptive advantage (cf. Bubic et al. 2010). Summary The current study aimed to investigate the recruitment of prediction processes during the tracking of abstract objects Barasertib following arbitrary motion trajectories (MOT; Pylyshyn and Storm Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical 1988). We operated under the assumption that prediction processes should be reflected by PM activation, as the PM has been previously demonstrated to be significantly involved in predictions of perceptual and motor events (Schubotz Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical and von Cramon 2004; Schubotz 2007; Wolfensteller et al. 2007; Stadler et al. 2011, 2012). Recording fMR-images during the performance of an Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical MOT task, we replicated previous results (Culham et al. 1998, 2001; Jovicich et al. 2001; Howe et al. 2009), revealing activations in occipitotemporal, parietal, and frontal areas. We claim that the found activations in the frontal cortex represent the dorsal and ventral premotor cortices. Importantly, though the role of
cognitive Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical resources other than prediction processes cannot be exhaustively determined, we made an effort to develop an experimental design that – to a considerable extent – was able to account for frontal activations associated with oculomotor control and spatial attention processes. To conclude, we propose that the found activations in the PM point the toward a signature of sensorimotor predictions of motion trajectories during MOT. Acknowledgments We would like to thank Christian Keitel, Barbara Vogt, Emily Cross, Sabrina Trapp, Susanne Holtze, Esther Kühn, and three anonymous reviewers for much appreciated comments and advice. We kindly thank Moritz Daum for generously placing his eye-tracking equipment at our disposal. S. A. expresses particularly cordial thanks to Stefanie Voigt for indispensable help in data collection, patient discussions on stimulus design over a foosball table, and general moral support. W. S. was supported with a grant of Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). Conflict of Interest None declared.