The ethanol was removed using a rotary evaporator, before the resulting aqueous solution, containing catechins, was dissolved in acetate buffer (pH 6.0, 0.2 M) for identification of the compounds present. Fifty milliliter of distilled water and 250 mg of each sample of tea were combined in 125 ml Erlenmeyer flasks. The extraction of compounds from green tea and yerba mate was performed in a water bath find more at 100 °C for 30 min. After being filtered on filter paper, the extracts were freeze-dried. The
resulting powder was called dried tea extract and used for antioxidant assays (Cao et al., 1996). As an identified representative polyphenol from green tea, the commercial standard epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG, 95%) was used as a control sample, as was the chlorogenic acid (95%) from yerba mate tea. These samples were tested for antioxidant power (by DPPH and ORAC assays) and treated with tannase, using the same procedures that were employed on the tea extracts. The extracts obtained from the green tea, yerba mate and the commercial control samples were used as substrates for enzymatic hydrolysis by tannase isolated from Paecilomyces variotii ( Battestin, Macedo, & Freitas, 2008). The dried tea extract (5 mg) was dissolved in 1 ml of phosphate buffer (pH 7.4, 75 mM) and incubated with Erastin mouse 5 mg of tannase at 40 °C
for 30 min. The hydrolysis process was stopped by placing the reaction in an ice bath for 15 min. The biotransformed tea was used for the antioxidant assay after suitable dilution with the same phosphate buffer (pH 7.4, 75 mM) for ORAC and with a 70% methanol solution for DPPH. A Finnigan Surveyor-series liquid chromatograph, equipped with a 150 × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 μm LicroCART® (Merck,
Darmstadt, Germany), reversed-phase C18 column maintained at 25 °C by a thermostat, was used. Mass detection was carried out using Urease a Finnigan LCQ DECA XP MAX (Finnigan Corp., San José, CA, USA) mass detector with an API (atmospheric pressure ionisation) source of ionisation and an ESI (ElectroSpray ionisation) interface. The solvents used were formic acid in H2O (1%, v/v) and acetonitrile. The capillary voltage was 4 V and the capillary temperature was 275 °C. The spectra were recorded in the positive-ion mode between 120 and 1500 m/z. The mass spectrometer was programmed to carry out a series of three scans: a full mass, a zoom scan of the most intense ion in the first scan, and a MS–MS of the most intense ion using relative collision energy of 30 and 60. The ORAC method used, with fluorescein (FL) as the ‘‘fluorescent probe”, was described by Ou, Huang, Hampsch-Woodill, Flanagan, and Deemer (2002) and modified by Dávalos et al. (2004). The automated ORAC assay was carried out on a NovoStar Microplate reader (BMG LABTECH, Germany) with fluorescence filters for an excitation wavelength of 485 nm and an emission wavelength of 520 nm. The measurements were made in a COSTAR 96 plate.