PubMed 40. Denman SE, McSweeney

CS: Development of a real-time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen. FEMS Micriobiol Ecol 2006, 58:572–582.CrossRef 41. Lane DJ: 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. Edited by: Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. New York City: John Wiley and Sons; 1991:115–175. 42. Hamady M, Lozupone C, Knight R: Fast UniFrac: facilitating high-throughput phylogenetic analyses of microbial communities including analysis of pyrosequencing and PhyloChip data. ISME J 2010, 4:17–27.PubMedCrossRef 43. Lozupone C, Knight R: UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Envir Microbiol 2005, 71:8228–8235.CrossRef Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors’ contributions SI carried out all DNA extraction, PCR, PhlyoTac and Unifrac analysis, and

drafted the manuscript. selleck inhibitor AW conceived of the study and participated in its design, and edited the manuscript. Both authors approved the final manuscript.”
“Background Several heavy metals play important roles as trace elements in the metabolism of all kingdoms of life. Whether a trace element is useful or harmful depends on its concentration. Particularly, chromium and cadmium are known to be much more toxic than useful for most microorganisms [1, 2]. Chromium is commonly present in solutions as chromate and dichromate oxyanions (Cr(VI)), the most redox-reactive and soluble forms of the metal [3]. Due www.selleckchem.com/products/gsk3326595-epz015938.html to its similar chemical structure to sulfate anions, chromate crosses membranes via sulfate uptake systems [4]. On the other hand, cadmium is a non-redox-reactive metal with high affinity for thiol groups [1, 2]. Once inside cells, chromate, dichromate and cadmium exert their toxic effects by directly damaging cellular components and by inducing

oxidative stress [1, 2]. In order to reduce the toxicity of chromate, dichromate and cadmium, some microorganisms eliminate these metals from the cytoplasm by using active transport efflux pumps [1, 2]. Cadmium can also be sequestered within the cells by metal-chelating proteins, while chromate and dichromate are reduced to the less toxic and insoluble trivalent cation Cr(III) by specific NAD(P)H-dependent Sclareol enzymes under aerobic conditions or in the electron transport chain of bacteria such as Pseudomonas fluorescens LB300 in anaerobic environments [4–9]. In addition, several enzymes work to counteract the deleterious effects of the oxidative stress induced following cell exposure to chromate, dichromate and cadmium. Caulobacter crescentus, an oligotrophic free-living α-proteobacterium, is able to grow in polluted habitats [10–12]. Not surprisingly, its genome encodes some homologues of genes involved in heavy metal resistance. In a previous report, the set of genes responding to Caulobacter exposure to chromate, dichromate and cadmium was identified [12].

coli, gentamicin (Gm), and erythromycin (Ery) 100. Genetic manipulations Conjugation experiments were performed on PY plates at 30°C, using overnight cultures grown to stationary phase. Donors and recipients were mixed in a 1:2 ratio and incubated overnight. The mixtures were collected and suspended in 1 ml of 10 mM MgSO4-0.01% Tween 40 (vol/vol). Serial dilutions were plated on suitable selective media. The transfer frequency was expressed as the number of transconjugants per

donor. A derivative of GR64 carrying a Tn5mob-labeled pSym was constructed by mating GR64 with strain S-17/pSUP5011 and selecting for resistance to Nal and Nm. Tagged plasmids were mobilized to A. tumefaciens GMI9023 [35] in triparental crosses, using pRK2013 [36] as helper, and selecting for RifR NmR transconjugants. Transconjugants LY2603618 carrying the tagged pSym (pSfr64b) were identified using Eckhardt type gels. To determine the presence of transmissible plasmids, we randomly labeled strain GR64 with Tn5-GDYN, by mating it with E. coli S17/Tn5-GDYN [17] and selecting NalR SpR transconjugants. MK-0457 chemical structure The labeled transconjugants were used as donors in conjugations with A. tumefaciens strain GMI9023. As the transposon integrates randomly into the chromosome or plasmids present in a strain, its integration into a transmissible plasmid confers a selective marker to the plasmid. Plasmids present in the selected transconjugants

were visualized with Eckhardt gels. The Tn5-GDYN element contains the sacR-sacB genes, which confer sucrose sensitivity in several gram-negative bacteria, so that selection of sucrose-resistant colonies allows the isolation of plasmid-less derivatives [17]. Plasmid-curing was carried out by plating overnight cultures of the transposon-labeled strains on PY plates

containing 12.5% sucrose. Sucrose-resistant colonies were selected and verified as SpS. Plasmid profiles of such colonies were analyzed in Eckhardt type gels. Construction of S. fredii and R etli derivatives with diverse plasmid DCLK1 content We constructed various derivatives of GR64 (Table 1): GR64-1 has pSfr64a labeled with Tn5-GDYN and pSfr64b with Tn5mob. This construct allowed us to obtain a derivative cured of pSfr64a (GR64-2). The absence of pSfr64a in GR64-2 was confirmed by Southern type hybridization of plasmid profiles probed with purified pSfr64a (Figure 1B), and of total restricted DNA (data not shown). Tn5-GDYN-labeled-pRet42a from R. etli CFN42 was introduced into GR64-2 to generate GR64-3. A derivative of GR64-2 with a Tn5-GDYN inserted in pSfr64b was constructed. This strain was used to generate GR64-4, cured of both plasmids. Tn5-GDYN-labeled-pRet42a from R. etli CFN42 was introduced into GR64-4 to generate GR64-5. To construct GR64-6, Tn5-GDYN-labeled-pSfr64a was introduced into GR64-4. CFN2001 is a derivative of R.

Sixteen samples (four groups of four samples) were collected and analyzed by 454 Flx pyrosequencing, and comparisons were made between Herd 1 and Herd 2, between Herd 1 Time 1 and Herd 1 Time 2 tissues, and between tissue and

brush samples from Herd 1 Time 2 in these results. Bar-coded 16S pyrosequencing A total of 210,433 quality reads were obtained from the four groups of pigs sampled, with at least 15,000 reads per group. Samples of tonsil tissue from Herd 1 at time 2 yielded the fewest number of quality reads. Table 1 shows the number CP-868596 supplier of reads obtained from each of the four groups of pigs and the percent of those reads that could be taxonomically assigned at a 60% confidence level using the RDP Classifier. Overall, greater than 97% of the total reads could be taxonomically assigned at the phylum, class, and order level. This dropped to 90.5% at the family level and further dropped to 72.3% at the genus level. Taxonomic assignment of reads was consistently learn more lower at all levels for Herd 2 compared to all three

groups of samples from Herd 1. Table 1 Taxonomic characterization of tonsillar microbial communities   Sample # Readsa Phylumb Classb Orderb Familyb Genusb Herd 2 Tissue 99894 95.6% 95.4% 94.8% 82.7% 64.7% Herd 1 Time 1 Tissue 54932 99.7% 99.6% 99.1% 96.7% 85.0% Herd 1 Time 2 Tissue 15929 99.8% 99.5% 99.4% 98.7% 70.1% Herd 1 Time 2 Brush 39678 99.9% 99.5% 99.5% 98.6% 75.0% Total # reads   210433 205795 205346 204467 190540 152192 Avg % Assigned     97.8% 97.6% 97.2% 90.5% 72.3% a the sum of all sequences of 4 individuals b%

of reads taxonomically assigned at each level Figure 1 shows the rarefaction plots for Suplatast tosilate the four groups. Herd 1 and Herd 2 plots demonstrate that Herd 2 had significantly more phylotypes and greater unsampled diversity (Figure 1A). Comparison of the three groups of Herd 1 pigs reveals similar trajectories even though the number of reads sampled varied (Figure 1B). Taken together, this suggests that the microbial community in the tonsils in Herd 2 was more complex at this level of interrogation. Figure 1 Rarefaction curves computed with the RDP Pyrosequencing Pipeline. Rarefaction curves are presented for each group of samples obtained by 454 pyrosequencing. The curves for herds 1 and 2 at time 1 are shown in panel A, while the curves for all three groups of samples from herd 1 are shown in panel B. As stated above, a total of 210,433 reads was obtained for the four groups. Table 2 indicates the number of reads made from each individual sample as well as the total for each group. The number of reads for each individual and each group forms the basis of the comparisons for the number of OTUs, Chao-1 richness, and the Simpson diversity indices. Using a cutoff of 97% identity for species level distinctions, the number of OTUs detected per sample ranged from 57 to 730.

Indeed, in JMEN trial (as well as in other ones) the discretion given to investigators in the choice of second-line therapy has been addressed as a major limitation, because it fails to provide any insight into the possibility that the benefit of maintenance therapy may be Erismodegib concentration obtained also by the appropriate use of the same agent as salvage therapy at the time of disease progression. In that respect, the design of the Fidias’ trial, with all patients receiving docetaxel as either maintenance or second-line treatment, appears to be a methodologically

more correct study design to test the efficacy of a strategy introducing a non cross-resistant agent before progression. In the SATURN trial only a minority of patients assigned to placebo actually received an EGFR-TKI: with the current evidence, we do not know if the improvement in OS observed with maintenance erlotinib would have been the same, or reduced, if the study protocol had imposed cross-over after disease progression. Importantly, the adoption of a pre-specified, built-in second-line treatment option offers the advantage NSC23766 ic50 of reducing the proportion of patients who do not get access to further treatment, as demonstrated in the recently reported trial from Perol, in which more than 80% of patients in the observation arm received second-line pemetrexed [21, 30, 31]. Even if a bevacizumab maintenance in patients receiving bevacizumab combined

with chemotherapy in the context of their first-line regimen is considered common practice on the

basis of the registration trials, both of which maintained bevacizumab until progression after the completion of the assigned first-line regimen, with the notable exception of the recently-presented ovarian cancer trial clearly supporting the use of maintenance Tangeritin bevacizumab, this specific issue has never been assessed in ad hoc designed randomized trials [4, 5, 38]. Currently there are at least two trials designed to clarify its role in maintenance: the ECOG three-arm, phase III study of Paclitaxel/Carboplatin/Bevacizumab followed by randomization to pemetrexed versus bevacizumab versus pemetrexed/bevacizumab in non-squamous carcinoma and a study with Pemetrexed/Cisplatin/Bevacizumab followed by Pemetrexed/Bevacizumab versus Bevacizumab alone [39]. The approximately 4-month median PFS with single-agent erlotinib maintenance in the SATURN trial and 4.76 months with the combination of erlotinib and bevacizumab in the ATLAS trial, highlights the importance of establishing the relative contribution of each agent when a combination therapy strategy is being evaluated in the maintenance setting [31, 32]. Another related question is whether subgroups of patients with specific clinico-pathological and/or molecular characteristics would especially benefit from the choice of a particular maintenance agent, among those currently available.

When STS of the film is ‘1’ as an ideal film,

it has 100% visible transmittance and 0% near-infrared transmittance. Therefore, this study attempted to obtain a factor that affects the performance see more of the film of highest selectivity with an STS approaching ‘1’. Figure 2 Spectral profiles from solar irradiance and that passing through the film fabricated by double layer coating method. (1) As in the brief illustration provided in Figure 1, a total light transmission and shielding (LTS) function (T total) from the visible to near-infrared regions has been proposed by summing the optical absorption and reflection-induced contribution terms using a tungsten bronze compound-based film. The contribution from the optical absorption of the film (T absorption) was determined using the Mie-Gans LSPR theory. The scattering reflection (T scattering) by the nanoparticles in the coated layer and reflection (T multilayer) based on differences of refractive index between the layers were included. The LTS function is provided

in Equation 2. The factors required selleck by various models have been quantitatively measured and are listed in Table 1. Table 1 Parameters used for calculating optical shielding property of the coated film Thickness of the coated layer [nm] Distance between nanocrystals [nm] Mean diameter of nanocrystals [nm] Dielectric constant of medium Refractive index of the coating layer Refractive index of the nanocrystals Refractive index of PET substrate 5,270 7.19 39.70 8.63 1.47 2.1 1.58 (2) Incident light absorption by the LSPR old According to the Mie-Gans theory [9, 17, 18], the absorption behavior of oval particles in solution is based on a dipole

approximation. Thus, the absorption characteristics of N particles in a volume V against a film of a given thickness (L) according to the wavelength (λ) of incident light can be explained by Equation 3 as follows: (3) The thickness has been set using statistical image analysis of the measurement results obtained via SEM with image J software. In addition, ϵ m, ϵ 1, and ϵ 2 refer to the dielectric constant of each medium, the real number term, and the imaginary number term in the dielectric function, respectively, and can be derived as follows: (4) The parameters for each incident light frequency (ω), volume plasma frequency (ω p), and collision frequency (γ) are closely related to the number density (ϱ) and conductivity (ζ) of the free electrons and were computed using Equations 5 and 6 as follows: (5) (6) in which τ, ϵ 0, and m e are the scattering time for the electrons, the transmittance under vacuum conditions, and the effective electron mass, respectively. The number density of free electrons is a property intrinsic to a given material and is calculated using in which V cell is the unit cell volume of the Cs0.33WO3 nanoparticle. As indicated in Figure 3, the unit cell dimensions of α and β axes were 0.74 and 0.76 nm, respectively.

By contrast, VO2max increased at this time in the DMW condition and was significantly higher by 9% compared with the placebo trial (effect size – 1.26). In the DMW trial, peak oxygen pulse was significantly higher by 5.4% at 4 h of recovery compared with control and by 7.5% compared with the placebo trial (Figure 2). Jump height was significantly reduced by ~11% in both trials (p < 0.05). this website Jump height returned to the control level 48 h after ADE in the DMW trial and was significantly higher (by ~6.6%, effect size – 0.52) than in the placebo trial at this time (Figure 3). CK activity showed a tendency to increase 24 h after ADE in both trials,

but the differences were not significant between trials or compared with control (p > 0.05) (Figure 4). Figure 1 Changes in maximum oxygen uptake during recovery. #p < 0.05 compared with control in the DMW condition; *p < 0.05 for the comparison between placebo and DMW. Figure 2 Changes in maximum oxygen pulse during recovery. *p < 0.05 between DMW and placebo trials. Figure 3 Changes in vertical jump height during recovery. #p < 0.05 during recovery in the DMW trial compared with control; \\p < 0.05 during recovery in the placebo trial compared with control; *p < 0.05 between the S3I-201 DMW and placebo trials. Figure 4 Changes in the activity of plasma creatine kinase during recovery. Discussion In this

study, we found that DMW with moderate mineralization extracted from a well at a depth of 689 m accelerated the short-term recovery of aerobic power and lower-body muscle power after a prolonged bout of dehydrating exercise in the heat. We focused only on performance

after rehydration with DMW or placebo and compared the recovery of these parameters 4, 24, and 48 h after dehydrating exercise in the heat. Thus, we do not have data on the extent to which performance was reduced in the hypohydrated state immediately after the ADE. Based on the literature, even modest exercise-induced dehydration of up to 2% of body weight can attenuate aerobic capacity [3, 6]. Another study reported only a small decrease in VO2max but a larger decrease in graded exercise time 1 h after dehydrating exercise causing a loss in body weight of 1.8–2.1% [19]. The subjects in our study lost nearly 3% of body weight after ADE, and one could expect a greater impact on performance than in the reports cited above. Replacement of sweat loss should help restore click here exercise capacity when the impairment is a consequence of a body water deficit. The type and amount of fluids ingested in the recovery period after exercise can significantly influence the restoration of fluid balance [10]. Full recovery of fluid balance can be achieved only when a significant, albeit insufficient, quantity of sodium is ingested after exercise. It has been shown that addition of 40–50 mmol/L–1 of sodium chloride to a rehydration beverage reduced subsequent urine output, thereby providing more effective rehydration than a sodium-free drink.

Among annotated genes of this dataset, those most represented belonged to the functional categories of ribosomal proteins (14, all

upregulated Torin 2 under HL+UV; see Fig. 4 and additional file 3: Table T1). However, most of these genes were also upregulated in the HL20 vs. HL18 comparison (data not shown), indicating that the diel expression pattern of these key translation genes was less affected by UV stress than by daytime, at least around the LDT period. Most of the genes that were differentially regulated in the UV20 vs. HL18 but not in the HL20 vs. HL18 comparisons belonged to the conserved hypothetical gene category (data not shown). Few genes were differentially expressed between HL and HL+UV during the dark period (4 genes in

the UV20 vs. HL20 and none in the UV22 vs. HL22 comparisons, corresponding to the G2 phase and the beginning of cell division, respectively; Fig. 4) and most of them were not assignable to a characterized functional category (see Fig. 4 and additional file 3: Table T1). This suggests that the effect of UV irradiation on the PCC9511 transcriptome was no longer significant only a few hours after the LDT. Altogether, surprisingly few genes belonging to pathways directly linked to the cell cycle crossed Pifithrin-�� in vitro the statistical significance (FDR < 0.1) and FC [log2(FC) < -1 or > 1] cutoffs (see additional file 3: Table T1). To insure that this was not due to a lack of sensitivity of the arrays and to gain more detailed information on the behavior of this gene category, seventeen genes were selected and subsequently analyzed by real time quantitative PCR (hereafter qPCR). This set includes 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase genes that were either differentially expressed in microarray analyses or representative of key processes, including DNA replication, cell division, DNA repair, transcriptional regulation and the circadian clock. All genes that exhibited

significantly different expression levels (i.e., with FDR ≤ 0.1) in one of our comparisons in microarray analyses showed a similar response (up- or downregulation) in qPCR experiments [Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.86 for pairwise comparisons with a log2(FC) < -0.5 or > 0.5]. Expression patterns of genes involved in the initiation of chromosome replication and cell division are strongly affected by UV radiation Three genes were selected as representatives of the DNA replication and cell division pathways, dnaA (PMM0565), encoding the DNA replication initiation protein DnaA, ftsZ (PMM1309), encoding the tubulin homolog GTPase protein FtsZ, which forms a ring-shaped septum at midcell during cell division, and sepF (PMM0395), encoding a protein involved in the assembly and stability of the FtsZ ring [32].

The recombinant GroEL gave the highest sensitivity at 88% (Table 2). Table 2 Major seroreactive proteins of C. burnetii on microarray probed with Q fever patient sera   Fluorescence

intensity Sensitivitya Protein Normal (n = 25) Acute early (n = 25) Acute late (n = 25) Convalescent (n = 6) Acute early Acute late Convalescent GroEL 114 ± 84 1548 ± 1996 3915 ± 3462 642 ± 382 84% 88% 83% YbgF 104 ± 83 752 ± 1308 1517 ± 1946 1176 ± 1061 44% 72% 67% RplL 85 ± 88 277 ± 396 949 ± 1174 185 ± 119 20% 68% 17% Mip 137 ± 78 324 ± 233 611 ± NCT-501 order 669 237 ± 157 44% 60% 17% Com1 70 ± 84 120 ± 326 461 ± 525 253 ± 176 12% 52% 50% OmpH 141 ± 95 210 ± 195 676 ± 1192 398 ± 540 20% 48% 17% DnaK 95 ± 91 143 ± 122 Selleck GM6001 371 ± 480 165 ± 105 16% 48% 17% a Sensitivity was calculated as the percentage (the number of microarray-positive sera divided by the number of sera of patients with Q fever) Specificity analysis of the major seroreactive proteins A small microarray fabricated with GroEL, YbgF, RplL, Mip, Com1, OmpH, and Dnak was

probed with rickettsial spotted fever, Legionella pneumonia or streptococcal pneumonia patient sera. The average FI value of each protein probed with acute late Q fever patient sera were significantly higher compared with that probed with the sera from the other three groups

of patients (P before < 0.05). A reaction was considered positive if the average FI of one protein probed with one of the tested sera were higher than the mean FI plus 2 times the standard deviation probed with the sera of healthy person sera (Additional file 3: Table S3). As a result, YbgF and DnaK displayed no reaction with any of the tested sera, and Com1 and Mip cross-reacted with one or two of the rickettsial spotted fever patient sera (Table 3). OmpH cross-reacted with one of the Legionella pneumonia or streptococcal pneumonia patient sera; GroEL cross-reacted with one of the Legionella pneumonia and two of the rickettsial spotted fever patient sera; RplL cross-reacted with two of the Legionella pneumonia and three of the streptococcal pneumonia patient sera (Table 3). Table 3 Specificity analysis of the major seroreactive proteins of C.

India J Clin Microbiol 2010, 48:1806–1811. 12. Afroz SN, Kobayashi S, Nagashima MM, Alam AB, Hossain MA, Rahman MR, Islam AB, Lutfor N, Muazzam MA, Khan SK, Paul AK, Shamsuzzaman MC, Mahmud AK, Mahmud Musa, Hossain MA: Genetic characterization ofStaphylococcus aureusisolates carrying Panton-Valentine Leukocidin genes in Bangladesh. Jpn J Infect Dis 2008, 61:393–396.PubMed 13. Ghaznavi-Rad E, Shamsudin MN, Sekawi Z, Yun Khoon L, Nazri Aziz M, Hamat RA, Othman N, Chong PP, van Belkum A, Ghasemzadeh-Moghaddam H, Neela V: Predominance and emergence of clones of hospital-acquired methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus

aureusin Malaysia. J Clin Microbiol 2010, 48:867–872.PubMedCrossRef 14. Monecke S, Slickers P, Ehricht R: Assignment ofStaphylococcus aureusisolates to clonal complexes based on microarray analysis and pattern recognition. FEMS Fer-1 price check details Immunol Med Microbiol 2008, 53:237–251.PubMedCrossRef 15. Heusser R, Ender M, Berger-Bachi B, McCallum N: Mosaic staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec containing two recombinase loci and a new mec complex,

B2. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007, 51:390–393.PubMedCrossRef 16. Chen FJK, Hiramatsu IW, Huang C, Wang , Lauderdale TL: PVL positive methicillin susceptible and resistantStaphylococcus aureusin Taiwan: identification of oxacillin-susceptible mecA positive MRSA. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2009, 65:351–357.PubMedCrossRef 17. Ender M, McCallum N, Berger-Bachi B: Impact of mecA promoter mutations on mecA expression and beta lactam resistance levels. Int J Med Microbiol 2008, 298:607–617.PubMedCrossRef 18. Ghebremedhin B, Konig W, Witte W, Hardy KJ, Hawkey PM, Konig B: Subtyping of ST22-MRSA-IV (Barnim epidemic MRSA strain) at a university clinic in Germany from 2002 to 2005. J Med Microbiol 2007, 56:365–375.PubMedCrossRef 19. Aires-de-Sousa

MB, Correia , de Lencastre H: Multilaboratory Project Collaborators: Changing Edoxaban patterns in frequency of recovery of five methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusclones in portugese hospitals: survelliance over a 16-year period. J Clin Microbiol 2008, 46:2912–2917.PubMedCrossRef 20. Hsu Li-Yang Y, Tse-Hsien Koh, Kurup A, Low J, Chlebicki P, Ban-Hock Tan: High incidence of Panton-Valentine Leukocidin producingStaphylococcus aureusin a tertiary care public hospital in Singapore. Clin Infect Dis 2005, 40:486–489.PubMedCrossRef 21. Aires-de-Sousa MT, Conceicao C, Simas , de Lencastre H: Comparison of genetic backgrounds of methicillin resistant and susceptibleStaphylococcus aureusisolates from Portuguese hospitals and the community. J Clin Microbiol 2005, 43:5150–5157.PubMedCrossRef 22. Han L, Ho P, Ni Y, Zhang H, Jiang Y, Chu H, Sun Y, Zhang Y: Panton-Valentine Leukocidin-positive MRSA, Shanghai, China. Emerg Infect Dis 2010, 16:731–733.PubMedCrossRef 23.

Microbiol Immunol 2004,2004(48):971–975. selleck products 8. Hendrix LR, Samuel JE, Mallavia LP: Differentiation of Coxiella burnetii isolates by restriction-endonuclease-digested DNA separated

by SDS-PAGE. J Gen Microbiol 1991, 137:269–276.PubMedCrossRef 9. Jager C, Willems H, Thiele D, Baljer G: Molecular characterization of Coxiella burnetii isolates. Epidemiol Infect 1998, 120:157–164.PubMedCrossRef 10. Glazunova O, Roux V, Freylikman O, Sekeyova Z, Fournous G, Tyczka J, Tokarevich N, Kovacava E, Marrie TJ, Raoult D: Coxiella burnetii genotyping. Emerg Infect Dis 2005, 11:1211–1217.PubMed 11. Mediannikov O, Fenollar F, Socolovschi C, Diatta G, Bassene H, Molez JF, Sokhna C, Trape JF, Raoult D: Coxiella burnetii in humans and ticks in rural Senegal. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2010, 4:e654.PubMedCrossRef 12. Svraka S, Toman R, Skultety L, Slaba K, Homan WL: Establishment of a genotyping scheme for Coxiella burnetii. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2006, 254:268–274.PubMedCrossRef 13. Arricau-Bouvery N, Hauck Y, Bejaoui A, Frangoulidis D, Bodier CC, Souriau A, Meyer H, Neubauer H, Rodolakis A, Vergnaud G: Molecular characterization of Coxiella burnetii

isolates by infrequent restriction site-PCR and MLVA typing. www.selleckchem.com/products/shp099-dihydrochloride.html BMC Microbiol 2006, 6:38.PubMedCrossRef 14. Roest HI, Ruuls RC, Tilburg JJ, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Klaassen CH, Vellema P, van den Brom R, Dercksen D, Wouda W, Spierenburg MA, van der Spek AN, Buijs R, de Boer AG, Willemsen PT, van Zijderveld FG: Molecular epidemiology of Coxiella burnetii from ruminants in Q fever outbreak, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis 2011, 17:668–675.PubMed 15. Beare PA, Samuel JE, Howe D, Virtaneva K, Porcella SF, Heinzen RA: Genetic diversity of the Q fever agent, Coxiella burnetii, assessed by microarray-based whole-genome

comparisons. J Bacteriol 2006, 188:2309–2324.PubMedCrossRef 16. Denison AM, Thompson HA, Massung RF: IS1111 insertion sequences of Coxiella burnetii: characterization and use for repetitive element PCR-based differentiation of Coxiella burnetii isolates. BMC Microbiol 2007, 7:91.PubMedCrossRef 17. Huijsmans CJ, Schellekens JJ, Wever PC, Toman R, Savelkoul PH, Janse I, Hermans MH: Single-nucleotide-polymorphism genotyping of Coxiella burnetii during a Q fever outbreak in The Netherlands. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011, 77:2051–2057.PubMedCrossRef Plasmin 18. Hornstra HM, Priestley RA, Georgia SM, Kachur S, Birdsell DN, Hilsabeck R, Gates LT, Samuel JE, Heinzen RA, Kersh GJ, Keim P, Massung RF, Pearson T: Rapid typing of Coxiella burnetii. PLoS One 2011, 6:e26201.PubMedCrossRef 19. Zhang G, To H, Russell KE, Hendrix LR, Yamaguchi T, Fukushi H, Hirai K, Samuel JE: Identification and characterization of an immunodominant 28-kilodalton Coxiella burnetii outer membrane protein specific to isolates associated with acute disease. Infect Immun 2005, 73:1561–1567.PubMedCrossRef 20. Musso D, Raoult D: Coxiella burnetii blood cultures from acute and chronic Q-fever patients. J Clin Microbiol 1995, 33:3129–3132.PubMed 21.